Blind Injustice, unleashed:
Disregarding all authentic accusers
Invalidating lucid, litigious logic
Suspending inherent, insistent incredulity
Belying total, terrible truth
Evincing encompassing evidentiary exhibits
Letting go, relinquishing reality
Ignoring presented, positive proof
Eroding judicial jurisprudence
Freeing culpable, self-confessed criminal!
This is posted response to Trifecta Week 44 challenge to use the third definition of the word <blind> :
”….3a : having no regard to rational discrimination, guidance, or restriction <blind choice> b : lacking a directing or controlling consciousness <blindchance> c : drunk”
Yes, as Linda said, I love how you play with words. And the message is very interesting. You’ve made me curious. I don’t know whether you are talking about a particular situation or just the state of affairs in general.
Thanks. I seldom know where i am going when I begin, then all of a sudden there it is! In this case I remembered the OJ verdict. technically, though, jury nullification is when the jury goes agains the judge’s instructions, for whatever reason. I used poetic license to describe one’s inability to believe the reams of evidence presented. Yet, often, disbelief remains in the nagging subconscious.
I love the form of this and, of course, all the alliteration. Thanks for linking up. See you back soon.
Thank you – now on to the next 33 words! Thank you for being there. Joanne
Ah yes. You are definitely into words. I like it! 😀